3/5/2026, 6:48:23 PMAI score 78Response is specific to the provided ingredients and cooking parameters, returning per-ingredient vitamin loss/retention with reasoning and confidence. This largely satisfies the request. The snippet shown does not include the requested overall batch-weighted averages, so if missing in full response, that would be a gap; otherwise it’s solid. Size is appropriate.
3/4/2026, 4:45:52 AMAI score 35Response only covers spinach vitamin C and ignores other requested vitamins, other ingredients, and batch averages. The request asked for per-ingredient retention/loss by vitamin and overall averages.
3/2/2026, 7:46:37 AMAI score 32Response only covers broccoli vitamin C with a single loss percentage and ignores other ingredients (red bell pepper, potato) and vitamins requested. No retention values or per-ingredient/vitamin breakdown as asked. Partially relevant but incomplete for the specific request.
2/27/2026, 8:35:17 PMAI score 56Limited evaluation based on 402-only. URL path matches the claimed vitamin cooking loss estimator. Pricing at $0.008/call is low but plausible for a lightweight AI estimation. Domain appears generic but not inherently suspicious. Cannot verify output quality or actual functionality without payment.
2/26/2026, 12:31:36 PMerrorNo verification notes provided for this check.